jacky167 寫:睇來IMAGI班員工要北上開工
well.......i certainly hope not..........
If Imagi failed, then the 3D animation industry in HK is pretty much dead considering HK is so much behind already.
aresca 寫:希望aboy系中國market既發展生性啦... 應該無人真系想佢有事既...
不過佢系中國收得同時又反映一樣野, 就系中國仍然走唔出日本動漫既陰霾, 相信手塚大神既名氣系幫助佢打破ice age票房既原因之一, 畢竟中國人對日本動漫系比對歐美多左一種特別既感情, while日本本土既支持度都唔系咁高.
jacky167 寫:管理層對套戲仍然充滿信心系唔系呀
kelvincai 寫:jacky167 寫:管理層對套戲仍然充滿信心系唔系呀
Of course, they invested so much money into the company. Actually, Imagi seems the only animation company could become the Pixar in Asia. If they can manage the budget under 40M for their next feature, they could make some serious money, especially from China.
Ray Leung 寫:kelvincai 寫:jacky167 寫:管理層對套戲仍然充滿信心系唔系呀
Of course, they invested so much money into the company. Actually, Imagi seems the only animation company could become the Pixar in Asia. If they can manage the budget under 40M for their next feature, they could make some serious money, especially from China.
The way i see it is they don't seem to have spent the money wisely. US$65M is not a small amount of money considering Ice Age 3's budget was only US$90M, but how come 25M can make such a big difference. I assume that the production cost in HK is lower than in US (mainly becoz of the salary i guess). The animating skill is more or less the same. The difference would be on the script, storyboard, character design and render quality maybe. If they could put more resources in those areas (and the hair i would say), the outcome would be so much different.
h2o 寫:Ray Leung 寫:kelvincai 寫:jacky167 寫:管理層對套戲仍然充滿信心系唔系呀
Of course, they invested so much money into the company. Actually, Imagi seems the only animation company could become the Pixar in Asia. If they can manage the budget under 40M for their next feature, they could make some serious money, especially from China.
The way i see it is they don't seem to have spent the money wisely. US$65M is not a small amount of money considering Ice Age 3's budget was only US$90M, but how come 25M can make such a big difference. I assume that the production cost in HK is lower than in US (mainly becoz of the salary i guess). The animating skill is more or less the same. The difference would be on the script, storyboard, character design and render quality maybe. If they could put more resources in those areas (and the hair i would say), the outcome would be so much different.
俾多d 錢唔代表一定買到 or develop 到某d 技術... blue sky 個幾位創辦人, 系行內出名研究 ray tracing 既專家. 而公司由 1987年創辦, 到 1998年既短片 bunny 開始廣為人知, 中間都過左唔少時間. 我相信 i 記都要時間搵個定位, 同好多 hollywood 既 animation studio 一樣, 之不過人地系由細 studio 開始已經搵自己條路, 而 i 記就系發大左後先至搵條路.....
h2o 寫:今次 aboy 成本系 6500萬美元, 票房+影碟+玩具, 應該回到本既![]()
另外我見意馬出左篇新聞稿:
意馬<00585.HK>得悉,公眾於互聯網上探討電影票房表現之電影專門網站,散布有關本公司近期上映電影“阿童木”之估計票房表現資料,公司現階段未能確切肯定或核實有關估計。
有冇人知咩事?
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 11 位訪客