[討論]關於產品美學潮流

[atv]

現在大部份商品也以流線形對稱為主 , 而有些商品開始以不規則形狀出現 , 同埋有D反一般美感出現 , 如現時興的衭浪趺至近小腿 ; 系咪因為年青人覺得 , 現時較年長的 (3x-4x)已經染金毛著牛仔衭 , 所以要以一種不會為年長人士覺得有美感的服飾出現呢 ? 其實人會唔會對流線形的商品厭倦 ?
而呢D會唔會影響到其它商品 , 變成ugly is beatiful ?

[choppy]

潮流有冇美感真系好難講....我就覺得宜家既潮流就只有潮流...沒什麼美感可言!!

[Siegfried]

Sorry that I can't type Chinese for the time being...

What I'm thinking is that, whatever fashion is, it's a matter of commercial activity that keeps feeding a huge bunch of staff, from the top CEO to the basic worker along the assembly line, so when certain fashion was launched for a period of time, a boom of another fashion is required to keep making money, so I think whether the product is ugly or not is not the point.

Another point is about who designed the product, for certain product, if I say it was designed by Philip Starck, then most people say its good, the appraisal was based primarily on the designer's reputation, if I tell you it was me who designed that product, then people would say"that's bad~~~", design is different from art, design is all about making money while improving people's quality of live, which are not necessarily be good in aesthetic.

And the most important issue is, for most trend followers, fashion=beauty, that's some kind of bullshxt to me. That's why I don't have much fashion product on my body, people say I'm out in fashion(though I'm a designer actually), but I don't give a dxmn to it anyway.

[shady_lady]

自從有塑膠就是流線夠簡潔易生產，雖然這個詞意(附加人體力學)多少被濫用.....lun住product同fashion泥好難講唔識分析喇問D.C.T.亞SIR啦。

其實中國人著衫都系相對保守女仔都系果幾只唔似架仔架妹玩到盡。

[shady_lady]

連發兩次，最近個SERVER系慢左。

[atv]

服裝只系舉例黎 , 我意思會唔會大家見得太多太接近形狀 , 乎合美學的東西 , 而產生反效果 , 太悶 ; 而扭轉左審美角度 , 創出新既潮流 ?

[shady_lady]

不同年代有不同審美意識很正常，每個階段的歷史都是“美”的完成，不是取代和扭轉而理解作不停進化和壯大，視覺的美也可能有一種普遍價值、客觀規律和永恆性......(問)為什麼覺得靚女系靚?(試下問哲學系的學生)真系深到爆唔識解......

[atv]

反過來說 , 如果李嘉欣公認為靚女 , 咁佢會系邊個年代變為丑女 ?
另外以現今科技 , 整到似佢真系唔難 , 但如果全世果都一個模 , 咁人類系咪會發展成沒有感覺 , 好似外星人or神 ?
其實個topic系因為Boss問我next trendy系乜所而發的 ! 如果冇記錯 , 我們仍系處於POP art or Rocket 時代的 !

[shady_lady]

“如果全世果都一個模 , 咁人類系咪會發展成沒有感覺”說中了，這就是美的一個奇妙之處，不能量化，所以人的獨特至高價值就體現在這裡。(而外星人or神在未完全公認現身之前，他們的形象只能訴諸感性判斷和神秘經驗，人是無法想像一個比人更靚的形象)

太多思考都系吹水，而家好似話叫後現代喎，總之mud七都玩下就算.......

睇多d架仔書好架喇。

[Siegfried]

我總覺得美學是一比較的名詞, 是相對的, 也是與周圍的事物, 人物及物件的互動產生物, 在亞當夏娃的世界內沒有比較, 夏娃一定系靚女, 亞當一定系靚仔, 套用到現在, 現在社會太多生產作比較, 但可笑的是購物者其實也不太明白就裡, 實用與否有時不太重要, "有得威", "in" 相反來得重要, 況且有時fashion/product 都是在一大堆 compromise 之下的產物, 其原意可跟原本差十萬八千裡.....

[chatho]

有人著衫仲可以停留o系七八十年代
你話佢out咩?但系佢又可以"潮"番bo
trend可以系一個cycle,可以系文化,可以系人為(etc.名牌)

所以咩叫做靚?有時真系估你唔到。

[atv]

我明白古老可當時興 , 就算喇叭衭/松高鞋都有線條 , 有美感 . 但系一D Hip hop 裝 oversize 就睇唔出有乜線條可言 ? 想像一個5尺掙2吋的人 , 著呢類裝束系幾咁得人騖 ! 一般人都系盡量將衣著改善自己外形 , 而唔會暴短 ?

[chatho]

hip-hop系一種文化，其實都唔太算系一種潮流
佢地著over size都系因為以前黑人窮，衫買大o的可以著耐o的同埋可以留俾細佬妹o者
潮流同美學系可以分開...哇?